<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: UPDATE: Charge for Access to Your Tweets? Twitter Japan&#8217;s New Micro-Payments Option is NOT here</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.socialsquared.com/2009/11/27/twitter-japan-micro-payment-pay-for-tweets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.socialsquared.com/2009/11/27/twitter-japan-micro-payment-pay-for-tweets/</link>
	<description>Social Media and Business from Vancouver BC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:10:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Glasberg</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsquared.com/2009/11/27/twitter-japan-micro-payment-pay-for-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-3765</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Glasberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 22:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsquared.com/?p=1692#comment-3765</guid>
		<description>TechCrunch now says this won’t happen. Have a look:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderstanding-twitter-japan-now-says-there-wont-be-a-subscription/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderst...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But to commemorate the fact that Twitter is NOT going to charge it’s users I have created a Twitter mockup that implements the exact functionality TechCrunch has described. It sells fake Robert Scoble SuperTweets. Have a look here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SuperTweets are tweets up to 420 characters. The mockup charges 1 cent micropayments to show each SuperTweet, and it charges 30 cents micro-subscription to show all of them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don’t know if this would work or not if Twitter implemented it, but TC seems to think it might, since this mockup follows exactly the functionality described here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-why-twitter-japans-subscription-model-might-work-in-japan&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you think??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch now says this won’t happen. Have a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderstanding-twitter-japan-now-says-there-wont-be-a-subscription/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderstanding-twitter-japan-now-says-there-wont-be-a-subscription/?referer=');">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderst&#8230;</a></p>
<p>But to commemorate the fact that Twitter is NOT going to charge it’s users I have created a Twitter mockup that implements the exact functionality TechCrunch has described. It sells fake Robert Scoble SuperTweets. Have a look here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html?referer=');">http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html</a></p>
<p>SuperTweets are tweets up to 420 characters. The mockup charges 1 cent micropayments to show each SuperTweet, and it charges 30 cents micro-subscription to show all of them.</p>
<p>I don’t know if this would work or not if Twitter implemented it, but TC seems to think it might, since this mockup follows exactly the functionality described here: <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-why-twitter-japans-subscription-model-might-work-in-japan" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-why-twitter-japans-subscription-model-might-work-in-japan?referer=');">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-&#8230;</a></p>
<p>What do you think??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Glasberg</title>
		<link>http://www.socialsquared.com/2009/11/27/twitter-japan-micro-payment-pay-for-tweets/comment-page-1/#comment-3412</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Glasberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Nov 2009 14:31:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.socialsquared.com/?p=1692#comment-3412</guid>
		<description>TechCrunch now says this won’t happen. Have a look:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderstanding-twitter-japan-now-says-there-wont-be-a-subscription/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderst...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But to commemorate the fact that Twitter is NOT going to charge it’s users I have created a Twitter mockup that implements the exact functionality TechCrunch has described. It sells fake Robert Scoble SuperTweets. Have a look here:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SuperTweets are tweets up to 420 characters. The mockup charges 1 cent micropayments to show each SuperTweet, and it charges 30 cents micro-subscription to show all of them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don’t know if this would work or not if Twitter implemented it, but TC seems to think it might, since this mockup follows exactly the functionality described here: &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-why-twitter-japans-subscription-model-might-work-in-japan&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;What do you think??</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>TechCrunch now says this won’t happen. Have a look:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderstanding-twitter-japan-now-says-there-wont-be-a-subscription/" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderstanding-twitter-japan-now-says-there-wont-be-a-subscription/?referer=');">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/28/misunderst&#8230;</a></p>
<p>But to commemorate the fact that Twitter is NOT going to charge it’s users I have created a Twitter mockup that implements the exact functionality TechCrunch has described. It sells fake Robert Scoble SuperTweets. Have a look here:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html?referer=');">http://www.icents.net/demo/faketwitter.html</a></p>
<p>SuperTweets are tweets up to 420 characters. The mockup charges 1 cent micropayments to show each SuperTweet, and it charges 30 cents micro-subscription to show all of them.</p>
<p>I don’t know if this would work or not if Twitter implemented it, but TC seems to think it might, since this mockup follows exactly the functionality described here: <a href="http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-why-twitter-japans-subscription-model-might-work-in-japan" rel="nofollow" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-why-twitter-japans-subscription-model-might-work-in-japan?referer=');">http://www.techcrunch.com/2009/11/27/6-reasons-&#8230;</a></p>
<p>What do you think??</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

